The Rachel Pauls article contains several ridiculous errors and demonstrates exactly the sort of ignorance I’m talking about.

She claims the glans is 1.5–2 cm long. Do you realize how ridiculous that is? This is as bad as a urologist claiming the penile glans is 10 cm long.

Rachel Pauls has elsewhere mislabeled the clitoral body as the glans.

Forget about knowing any kind of detailed absent, as is always shown for the penis. Doctors can’t even get basic morphology right.

But yes I suppose it’s nice that she at least demonstrates some interest.

But this article is a great example of the degree of scientific laziness with which people approach the clitoris.